Fluoride in Drinking Water – What You’re Not Being Told

 Fluoride in Drinking Water – What You’re Not Being Told

• Fluoride in tap water is not natural calcium fluoride, but hydrofluorosilicic acid – a byproduct of phosphate fertilizer production.

• Classified by the EPA as hazardous waste, requiring strict handling and disposal under federal law.

• Utah banned fluoridation in 2024, making it the first U.S. state to do so.

• Water districts, like Weber Basin Conservancy, must now dispose of fluoride as hazardous waste after May 7.

• Suggestions to “burn off” fluoride by increasing water feed rate to 4 mg/L raised concerns due to toxicity risks.

• 4 mg/L is associated with skeletal fluorosis, and even 0.7 mg/L may lower children’s IQ.

• Fluoride contains arsenic, lead, mercury, and chromium, according to expert Phyllis Mullenix, Ph.D.

• Disposal estimated to cost $125,000 for one district alone; others face similar costs.

• Fluoridation chemicals are not pharmaceutical-grade; they're unpurified industrial byproducts.

• Most fluoridation chemicals are now imported from China, where regulation is looser.

• Fluorosilicic acid damages infrastructure and harms water operators through off-gassing and corrosiveness.

• In 2000, EPA scientist Dr. William Hirzy criticized fluoridation: “If it goes into the air, it’s a pollutant … but into your water, it’s not?”

• Legal challenges forced the EPA to reconsider regulations on fluoridation:
  https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/epa-water-fluoride-hazardous-waste

• Three major fluoride producers — Mosaic, Solvay, Simplot — admitted no safety testing has been done:
  https://fluoridealert.org

• Critics argue for safer, targeted dental care methods instead of mass water fluoridation.

• Many U.S. cities are reconsidering policies due to costs, health risks, and lack of informed consent.

Summarize:

🚱 What’s Really in Your Water?
Did you know the fluoride in most U.S. tap water isn’t natural? It’s a toxic byproduct of fertilizer production – and it's classified as hazardous waste by the EPA. 😳

🔹 NOT natural calcium fluoride
🔹 Comes from phosphate mining (China is a major source)
🔹 Contains arsenic, lead, mercury
🔹 Linked to lower IQ in kids, bone disease, and neurotoxicity
🔹 Costs millions to add — and now, remove

🧪 One whistleblower asked: “If it’s a pollutant in the air, why is it medicine in water?”
🔥 Utah just became the first U.S. state to ban fluoridation. More are questioning it.

👉 Follow up here:
📎 https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/epa-water-fluoride-hazardous-waste
📎 https://fluoridealert.org

💬 Time to rethink mass medication. Share to spread awareness. #FluorideTruth #WaterSafety #InformedConsent #CleanWater

 Healthy UpRising—where healthcare includes breath, bike paths, food growing, and emotional healing; where education includes the arts, nature, and purpose. Explore reflections, resources, and ideas at:
https://healthyuprising-dro.blogspot.com/

some more detail with sources:

1. Fluoride in tap water is not natural calcium fluoride but hydrofluorosilicic acid – a byproduct of phosphate fertilizer production.

• While specific peer-reviewed studies detailing the industrial origins of hydrofluorosilicic acid are limited, various reports and environmental assessments have documented that the fluoride compounds used in water fluoridation are byproducts of phosphate fertilizer manufacturing processes.​

2. Classified by the EPA as hazardous waste, requiring strict handling and disposal under federal law.

• The classification of hydrofluorosilicic acid as hazardous waste is based on its chemical properties and potential risks. Regulatory documents and environmental guidelines outline the handling and disposal requirements for such substances.​

3. Utah banned fluoridation in 2024, making it the first U.S. state to do so.

• This policy change is documented in state legislative records and public health announcements.​

4. Water districts, like Weber Basin Conservancy, must now dispose of fluoride as hazardous waste after May 7.

• Details about disposal requirements can be found in environmental regulations and waste management protocols.​

5. Suggestions to “burn off” fluoride by increasing water feed rate to 4 mg/L raised concerns due to toxicity risks.

• Studies have shown that elevated fluoride levels can pose health risks. For example:​

  • Fluoride Exposure and Skeletal Fluorosis: a Systematic Review and Dose-response Meta-analysis
    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37861949/

6. 4 mg/L is associated with skeletal fluorosis, and even 0.7 mg/L may lower children’s IQ.

• Research indicates potential neurodevelopmental effects at various fluoride concentrations:​

  • Fluoride exposure and cognitive neurodevelopment: Systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis
    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36639015/

7. Fluoride contains arsenic, lead, mercury, and chromium, according to expert Phyllis Mullenix, Ph.D.

• Analyses of fluoridation chemicals have detected trace amounts of various contaminants.​

8. Disposal estimated to cost $125,000 for one district alone; others face similar costs.

• Financial reports and budget assessments from water districts provide insights into disposal costs.​

9. Fluoridation chemicals are not pharmaceutical-grade; they're unpurified industrial byproducts.

• The quality and composition of fluoridation chemicals have been discussed in environmental and public health literature.​

10. Most fluoridation chemicals are now imported from China, where regulation is looser.

• Trade records and import data highlight the sources of fluoridation chemicals.​

11. Fluorosilicic acid damages infrastructure and harms water operators through off-gassing and corrosiveness.

• Occupational safety studies have examined the effects of handling fluoridation chemicals.​

12. In 2000, EPA scientist Dr. William Hirzy criticized fluoridation: “If it’s a pollutant in the air, why is it medicine in water?”

• Dr. Hirzy's statements have been recorded in public testimonies and environmental discussions.​

13. Legal challenges forced the EPA to reconsider regulations on fluoridation.

• Legal documents and court rulings detail the challenges and subsequent regulatory reviews.​

14. Three major fluoride producers — Mosaic, Solvay, Simplot — admitted no safety testing has been done.

• Company disclosures and environmental assessments provide information on safety testing practices.​

15. Critics argue for safer, targeted dental care methods instead of mass water fluoridation.

• Public health discussions and policy analyses explore alternative dental care strategies.​

16. Many U.S. cities are reconsidering policies due to costs, health risks, and lack of informed consent.

• Municipal records and public health debates document the reevaluation of fluoridation policies.